RESPONSIBLE AI-ASSISTED ACCOUNTING FOR SMALL ENTERPRISES: A GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR HUMAN JUDGMENT, DATA QUALITY, AND AUDITABLE DECISIONS

Authors

  • Adang Haryaman Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional Author
  • Anggun Yolistina Yayasan Kreatif Indonesia Emas, Bandung, 40281, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, accounting governance, human judgment; data quality, small enterprises

Abstract

This conceptual and integrative review develops a framework for responsible AI-assisted accounting in micro, small, and medium enterprises. It addresses the problem that accessible AI tools can strengthen accounting work while also creating risks of opaque outputs, weak source validation, privacy exposure, and excessive reliance on automated recommendations. Drawing on the resource-based view, dynamic capabilities, organizational learning, absorptive capacity, social capital, and resilience, the paper explains how task-risk classification, verified data inputs, human professional review, decision traceability, continuous control learning can be organized as mutually reinforcing routines. The proposed pathway moves from problem diagnosis and capability mapping to bounded experimentation, evidence review, resource reconfiguration, and learning retention. No primary survey, interview, experimental, administrative, or statistical data are claimed. The framework links these mechanisms to accounting reliability, timely insight, professional accountability, controlled efficiency, auditable decisions and identifies managerial, institutional, and research implications suitable for resource-constrained enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press.

Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.

Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13, 215-246.

Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2021). Artificial intelligence: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy: A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.

Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029-1055.

OECD. (2021). The Digital Transformation of SMEs. OECD Publishing.

Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019). The sociotechnical axis of cohesion for the IS discipline. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 695-719.

Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49-72.

Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Verhoef, P. C., et al. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901.

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144.

West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: A review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01

How to Cite

RESPONSIBLE AI-ASSISTED ACCOUNTING FOR SMALL ENTERPRISES: A GOVERNANCE MODEL FOR HUMAN JUDGMENT, DATA QUALITY, AND AUDITABLE DECISIONS. (2025). Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum, 2(8), 11-20. https://jesocin.com/index.php/jesocin/article/view/112

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >> 

Similar Articles

41-50 of 89

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.