ACCOUNTING INFORMATION QUALITY AND CORPORATE AUDIT EFFECTIVENESS: A RISK-BASED ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL ENTERPRISES

Authors

  • JESOCIN Editorial Team Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Accounting Information Quality, Audit Effectiveness, Internal Control, Audit Analytics, Corporate Governance

Abstract

Background: Digital accounting systems increase the volume and speed of records but do not automatically improve reliability. Automated processing can reproduce configuration errors at scale, obscure accountability, and create evidence that is abundant yet poorly governed.

Aims: This article develops a risk-based assurance framework linking accounting information quality, internal control, audit evidence, technology-enabled procedures, professional judgment, and governance oversight.

Research Method: The study uses an integrative conceptual review. Peer-reviewed literature, professional standards, and official institutional sources are synthesized through construct clarification, mechanism mapping, governance analysis, and development of propositions. The article does not report fabricated respondents, database counts, or statistical estimates.

Results and Conclusion: The synthesis indicates that organizational value arises when information, decisions, controls, and performance measures operate as an integrated management system. Technology or functional activity alone is insufficient. Clear accountability, reliable data, balanced indicators, and periodic review are the principal enabling conditions.

Contribution: The paper offers a practical capability framework and testable propositions that can guide organizational assessment and subsequent empirical research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2013). Internal Control - Integrated Framework. COSO.

DeFond, M., & Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002

Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big Data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2019). ISA 315 Revised 2019 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement. IFAC.

International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2023). Handbook of International Quality Management Auditing Review Other Assurance and Related Services Pronouncements. IFAC.

International Accounting Standards Board. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IFRS Foundation.

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Downloads

Published

2026-09-09

How to Cite

ACCOUNTING INFORMATION QUALITY AND CORPORATE AUDIT EFFECTIVENESS: A RISK-BASED ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK FOR DIGITAL ENTERPRISES. (2026). Journal of Jabar Economic Society Networking Forum, 3(9), 31-40. https://jesocin.com/index.php/jesocin/article/view/130

Similar Articles

71-80 of 87

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.